AN UNBIASED VIEW OF RESPONSIBILITY OF FINDER OF GOODS CASE LAWS

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, make certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is place in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally identified conviction. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised of website the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they had very little to worry about.

We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed via the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.

Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court as well as Court of Appeals are routinely obtainable. Decisions of the reduced (trial) courts are not generally published or distributed.

Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation over the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect instead of abduct. Read more

Any court may well seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be 1 or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason for that decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.

The uncovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more

Report this page